This past weekend, my family and I watched the movie In Time starring Justin Timberlake and Amanda Seyfried. It is a story about a futuristic earth in which time has become what money is today. Essentially everyone grows and lives until 25 years of age at which point a clock under the left forearm begins counting down one year’s worth of time. From this point on, “Darwinian Capitalism” takes over where those who can acquire more time can live longer and those who can’t end up dying early. In other words, the rich can be immortal while the poor die. For a more complete synopsis of the movie, see its Wikipedia entry.
Commissioned by Occupy Wall Street?
Had I not known that the movie had to start filming last year, I would have sworn that it was written with the Occupy Wall Street movement as its primary backer. Obviously the amount of wealth inequality has struck a nerve in Hollywood as well since the antagonist of the film is Philippe Weis who is essentially a time “banker” who sets interest rates in the ghetto at 30% and above. He has accumulated several million years at the expense of the poor and lives in New Greenwich.
Of course, the poor guy from the ghetto of Dayton (poor manufacturing Midwestern town in Ohio) and rich guys daughter fall in love and he explains the inhumane nature of the world, and they go on a futuristic Bonnie and Clyde meets Robin Hood quest to shake things up.
Overall, I thought it was an interesting story with a message that is especially ringing true in these times. It certainly got me to thinking instead of simply sitting back and being entertained. So what are some of the things that I thought about while watching and afterwards?
My Broader Social Thoughts
1. There are nice people and evil people in all economic classes. Obviously the banker has made his fortune by exploitation of the poor, but not all of the rich get rich by deceptive means. Some actually enhance the quality of life and many people pay for those enhancements. Henry Ford and Steve Jobs immediately come to mind. I feel that they deserve to be rich due to their products’ impact upon society.
In the movie, one of the rich comes to the ghetto since he is sick of living. He is buying drinks in a bar and about to get robbed by the thug of the story who preys on others in Dayton. Our protagonist, Will Salas, helps this guy escape and behaves honorably telling the rich guy that he won’t steal any of his century of life despite having little more than a day. While asleep, this time is transferred by the rich guy to Will who encourages him not to waste the time.
2. The price of admission increases along the economic ladder. Once Will discovers that he has all of this newly found “currency”, he decides to go to the time zone of the rich. Each border that he crosses requires a progressively higher toll to get into the next zone.
Each step of the economic ladder that we climb seemingly requires a more expensive car, larger house, finer clothing. We feel that we have to keep up with our neighbors. The price of admission goes up and up until we reach the point of billionaires striving for the biggest yacht. I thought it appropriate that this was depicted in the movie, but it was subtle and lost on many I suspect.
3. Sometimes to become wealthy, you have to take a risk. After arriving in the rich enclave of New Greenwich, Will takes his 100 years and parlays that stake into over 1000 by playing poker. Of course, when he does it comes down to one hand in which he is “all in” save for a few seconds. Gotta love the cinematic drama!
Of course, real entrepreneurs that become wealthy have sold shoes from the trunk of their car (Philip Knight of Nike) or borrow money to open a store (Fred De Luca and Peter Luck of Subway). Obviously, there are many other stories but most of the successful ones have some element of risk involved.
4. Money doesn’t buy happiness. The rich are so afraid of inadvertently getting killed that they can’t enjoy their accumulated time. Sylvia Weis, the banker’s daughter, has been prohibited from swimming in the ocean by her parents because of the risk of injury and death. The rich display their cars rather than drive them and have guards constantly present.
In real life, enough said.
5. Time is money. The whole context of the movie is that time has become the new currency. But is it really any different than today? How long do you have to work to make that mortgage payment each month? How much of my life have I given to VISA? Am I truly any different than the indentured servants of the middle ages? Probably not. I just have air conditioning and an iPod.
There were some other thoughts that I had from the movie, one of which I want to save for Wednesday’s post and develop more than these but I think you get the idea.
In the meantime, did you see the movie? It doesn’t seem like many people did although I was surprised to see about 20 people in the theater. I figured we would be the only ones since it has been out for almost four weeks. I bet it will be gone soon if not already. Anyway, it is an interesting storyline, and got me to thinking more than many movies.
Readers: Did you see the movie? Any thoughts based upon the basic premise? I am sure a lot of interesting discussion could come of a movie like this.